<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Up! Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://omohide.com/613/up-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://omohide.com/613/up-review/</link>
	<description>&#34;When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness.&#34;  - C.S.Lewis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laica</title>
		<link>http://omohide.com/613/up-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>Laica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omohide.com/?p=613#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>I think Up! was just as entertaining in the later parts, although I see your point about it being more childish. But I think maybe it is the difference in tone that&#039;s a little disorienting. I mean, the first five minutes have most people in tears by their end, and then there is such a radical shift not only in tone - to cranky-old-man humour, cuteness and adventure - but almost in genre. Like the prologue was mini-biopic and the main story is a fantastical, larger-than-life adventure story. I enjoyed both equally (and the stunning visuals didn&#039;t hurt either), but I can see why not everyone would.

Great site, by the way, I just discovered it today! You are multitalented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Up! was just as entertaining in the later parts, although I see your point about it being more childish. But I think maybe it is the difference in tone that&#8217;s a little disorienting. I mean, the first five minutes have most people in tears by their end, and then there is such a radical shift not only in tone &#8211; to cranky-old-man humour, cuteness and adventure &#8211; but almost in genre. Like the prologue was mini-biopic and the main story is a fantastical, larger-than-life adventure story. I enjoyed both equally (and the stunning visuals didn&#8217;t hurt either), but I can see why not everyone would.</p>
<p>Great site, by the way, I just discovered it today! You are multitalented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://omohide.com/613/up-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omohide.com/?p=613#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>The problem with Cars was that it could have been any old movie with real actors.  They basically just invented a world where cars are humans, whereas in Monsters Inc or Finding Nemo they showed you a whole different perspective on the world from that of a fish or a monster in the closet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Cars was that it could have been any old movie with real actors.  They basically just invented a world where cars are humans, whereas in Monsters Inc or Finding Nemo they showed you a whole different perspective on the world from that of a fish or a monster in the closet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://omohide.com/613/up-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omohide.com/?p=613#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>lol, I guess childish things still entertain me ^^;;

Was Cars not that great? =O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, I guess childish things still entertain me ^^;;</p>
<p>Was Cars not that great? =O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

